IJCA Vol 4 i1 2025 webmag - Flipbook - Page 15
2025 | Volume 4, Issue 1
and implicit information within the ISO/IEC 17025
standard. However, the difference in criterion-based
understanding highlights the need for speci昀椀c
con昀椀gurations. As highlighted by the “AI-ladder”
concept described by Maqsood et al. (2024), the
design and training of the model determine its ability
to tackle more complex tasks.
Taken together, these results highlight both the
growing potential of generative AI in technical and
standardization contexts, and the importance of
intentional customization to ensure meaningful,
standards-aligned outputs.
Conclusions
1. Customization Enhances Normative Interpretation
Capability
L-Squad, with its speci昀椀c con昀椀guration and training
based on reinforcement learning, demonstrates
clear potential as a tool for interpreting and guiding
the application of the ISO/IEC 17025 standard.
This underscores the importance of customizing
generative models to align their responses with
speci昀椀c normative requirements.
2. Generative AI Holds Promise for Supporting the
Application of Technical Standards
The results show that, with proper con昀椀guration,
generative AI tools can interpret technical
information and support the implementation
of standards like ISO/IEC 17025. However, the
con昀椀guration and training of the model are critical
factors in ensuring its effectiveness in normative
contexts.
3. Need for Human Veri昀椀cation
Despite its ability to justify responses, the use
of generative AI does not eliminate the need
for review and validation by specialists. This
highlights the importance of combining generative
AI with human expertise to ensure accurate and
responsible use in future normative applications.
References
1. CENIA. (2024). Índice Latinoamericano de Inteligencia
Arti昀椀cial (ILIA) 2024. Santiago, Chile: Centro Nacional de
Inteligencia Arti昀椀cial.
2. ISO/IEC JTC 1 SC 42 Arti昀椀cial Intelligence – Working
Group 4. (2024). Use Cases in Arti昀椀cial Intelligence.
International Organization for Standardization.
3. Maqsood, A., Chen, C., & Jacobsson, T. J. (2024).
The future of material scientists in an age of arti昀椀cial
intelligence. Advanced Science, 11(2401401). https://doi.
org/10.1002/advs.202401401
15
4. OECD. (2023). Common guideposts to promote
interoperability in AI risk management. OECD Arti昀椀cial
Intelligence Papers, No. 5. https://oecd.ai/wips
5. ISO/IEC. (2023). ISO/IEC 42001:2023: Information
technology — Arti昀椀cial intelligence — Management
system. International Organization for Standardization.
6. Pedreño Muñoz, A., González Gosálbez, R., Mora Illán,
T., Pérez Fernández, E. del M., Ruiz Sierra, J., & Torres
Penalva, A. (2024). La inteligencia arti昀椀cial en las
universidades: Retos y oportunidades. Grupo 1MillionBot.
7. OpenAI. (2024). Data analysis with ChatGPT. OpenAI Help
Center. https://help.openai.com/en/articles/8437071data-analysis-with-chatgpt
8. OpenAI. (2024). ChatGPT capabilities overview.
OpenAI Help Center. https://help.openai.com/en/
articles/9260256-chatgpt-capabilities-overview
9. Zapata Ros, M. (2024). IA generativa y ChatGPT en
educación: Un reto para la evaluación y ¿una nueva
pedagogía? Revista Paraguaya de Educación a Distancia,
FACEN-UNA, 5(1), 12–44. https://doi.org/10.56152/
reped2024-vol5num1-art2
10. Fernández-Samos Gutiérrez, R. (2023). La inteligencia
arti昀椀cial en la redacción y autoría de publicaciones
cientí昀椀cas. Angiología, 75(5), 281-283. https://doi.
org/10.20960/angiologia.00512
11. Smith, B., Jiang, X., & Peters, R. (2024). The effectiveness
of Duolingo in developing receptive and productive
language knowledge and pro昀椀ciency. Language
Learning & Technology, 28(1), 1–26. https://hdl.handle.
net/10125/73595
12. Naik, I., Naik, D., & Naik, N. (2024). ChatGPT is all you
need: Untangling Its underlying AI models, architecture,
training procedure, capabilities, limitations and
applications. TechRxiv. https://doi.org/10.36227/
techrxiv.173273427.76836200/v1
13. The CHART Collaborative. (2024). Protocol for the
development of the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool
(CHART) for clinical advice. BMJ Open, 14(e081155).
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081155
Author Biography
Diego Uribe is an assessor for the International
Accreditation Service (IAS). Based in Peru, he is the
founder of LAB SQUAD, an organization focused on
training and consulting in accreditation and quality
management systems. His expertise includes
conformity assessment, risk management, and
the application of international standards, with
a specialization in ISO/IEC 17025 across Latin
America.
